Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
81
General Discussion / Re: FYI: I'm getting one assertive billy-goat station wagon!!
« Last post by Blicj11 on January 26, 2026, 01:19:58 AM »
Edouard:

It's great to see another photo of Biquette after a 16-month hiatus. I hope you are in just as good shape as that 61-year-old automobile.
82
Dear WeatherCat fans of a certain rascally wagon,

It is winter in the northern hemisphere and large tracts of North America are in blizzard conditions.  However, in mild California you can drive a classic car most of the year.  There is a greet and meet tradition called "cars and coffee."  There was one this morning in an unused parking lot.  The sponsor champions import and exotic cars, but welcomes classic American cars as well.  Next to my trusty 1965 Buick Special wagon, a fellow parked his 1967 Chevy El Camino:



If they look familiar it is because they are built on the same chassis.  That's a good thing for my wagon - another source of reproduction parts!

Stay tuned for more photos - assuming I can manage to keep my wagon from getting any more spoiled then she already is!!  [biggrin]

Edouard  :)
83
WeatherCat General Discussion / Re: Questions About Battery Warnings
« Last post by elagache on January 26, 2026, 12:52:36 AM »
Dear jmcdermo and WeatherCat station caregivers,

First, welcome to our restored forum!!

Unfortunately, I've never seen the error messages you are getting.  Can you tell us what you "Station Hardware Options" pane is displaying?  It is near the bottom of the Tools menu just before the first dividing line.  It is described in the current WeatherCat menu about page 70.

Please let us know what you discover.  If possible a screenshot would be ideal.

Edouard
84
Development Blog / Weather station for your RV? (Re: Ecowitt - some thoughts)
« Last post by elagache on January 26, 2026, 12:33:04 AM »
Dear Stu and WeatherCat adventurers,

I am hopelessly behind (La Routine Habituelle Quoi)  However, I promise to provide an update on my recent Airstream purchase (and ongoing restoration) as soon as I can pry free some time.

However, I have a weather station for so long that the itch of somehow strapping a station to the trailer when camped is basically irresistible.  I've been thinking about the Ecowitt stations for a while because of the modest cost.  This application doesn't require high precision so it seemed like a good match.

Just doing some quick web surfing, I spot this station:

https://www.ecowitt.com/shop/goodsDetail/251#

The instrument cluster is this:

https://www.ecowitt.com/shop/goodsDetail/350#

It's weight is a modest 498 grams  (17.5 ounces or a bit over a pound.)

Thanks to Amazon, the price isn't too bad:

https://a.co/d/783hKUY

Securing it to an Airstream trailer is a problem, but there are suction cup mounts for flags.  Here is one called Flag Pole Buddy:

https://flagpolebuddy.com/products/ols/products/starlink-for-airstream-custom-suction-cup-mounting

These are designed for the Space-X StarLink, but obviously they would work for a weather station.

Now that the forum is reopened, what do WeatherCatters think?

A curious mind would like to know!

Edouard  :)

   
85
WeatherCat General Discussion / Questions About Battery Warnings
« Last post by jmcdermo on January 26, 2026, 12:28:22 AM »
I've read a few posts in this discussion thread and I'm still confused so I thought I'd ask my specific question to see if I figure this out once and for all.
I have a Davis Vantage Vue weather station with the console powered by the wall wart. This is an older style monochrome console that's been running since December 2011. In addition to the wall wart it has 3 C cell batteries in its base. Obviously I have the weather station on a pole on the roof with its CR123 Lithium battery. I also have the Davis Weather Envoy powered by a wall wart connected to my Mac where I run the WeatherCat software.

I've been getting the following errors emailed to me periodically from the WeatherCat software:

WeatherCat Vantage Driver: ***Station Power Alert*** Console voltage is low - actual value is 2.607 Volts.

WeatherCat TimeStamp: 16:12:08 25-Jan-26


And today I received an additional email:
WeatherCat Vantage Driver: Station Power Alert. Transmitter battery failure.
ISS battery - Good.
Transmitter 2 - Good.
Transmitter 3 - Good.
Transmitter 4 - Good.
Transmitter 5 - Good.
Transmitter 6 - Good.
Transmitter 7 - Fail.
Transmitter 8 - Good.


WeatherCat TimeStamp: 16:12:08 25-Jan-26


I'm assuming the second email I got today with the "Transmitter 7 - Fail." notice is an indication that the CR123 battery needs changing in the weather station on the roof. Is that correct?

If that's correct, then the thing that's confusing to me is the other battery warning email that I've been getting for some time. Is that from the console? If so, how could the console battery power be low when it's plugged in? I changed the C-cell batteries pretty recently, but the messages show up. Could the wall wart be dying? If so, I've never seen a wall wart degrade slowly, they've always just worked or not worked.

Any help explaining this will be greatly appreciated.
86
WeatherCat Releases / Re: WeatherCat Version 3.3.3 Released
« Last post by Blicj11 on January 26, 2026, 12:08:13 AM »
Thank you Stu!

Running fine here so far.

Computer: 2019 27" iMac Retina 5K, 3.8 GHz Intel i9, 40 GB RAM
OS: macOS 14.8.3 Sonoma
Hardware: Davis Wireless Vantage Pro2 Plus, original WeatherLink IP data logger
Software: WeatherCat version 3.3.3 (Build 20)
87
Development Blog / Ecowitt - some thoughts
« Last post by WCDev on January 25, 2026, 04:42:36 PM »
WetherCat 4 (currently in development, see https://athena.trixology.com/index.php?topic=3671.0) includes support for the range of Fine Offset weather gateways and consoles, marketed under a variety of brands, perhaps the biggest of which is Ecowitt (https://www.ecowitt.com/shop/homePage).

The last time I dealt with FO was coding up their USB based stations for WeatherCat (see https://wiki.trixology.com/index.php?title=Fine_Offset) and fine tuning the USB timings to try to avoid locking the thing up - not an enjoyable experience.

Time moves on, and they've now moved onto IP based gateways and consoles. These are provided at relatively reasonable prices and reasonable quality levels. As such they appear to be pretty popular.

These newer 'stations' are simpler to talk to, but the protocols are still just slightly on the wrong side of what you might call 'good professional software design', i.e. in a lot of cases completely bonkers (see https://athena.trixology.com/index.php?topic=3672.msg35073;topicseen#msg35073 for an example), with multiple API's available e.g binary based, some json and historical access via .csv files (and WeatherCat uses all to communicate to these stations, because you have to :) ).

But having said that, they seem to be remarkably reliable and perform well. I've been running one in parallel with a fan aspirated Davis set up and the readings are (mostly) comparable (after a little tuning). Now granted, it's mid-winter here in the UK and I only have a few weeks of running under my belt, but so far, I'm suitably impressed! Right now, I like 'em.

A few pics are attached to this post. You'll see one with two internal temp/hum sensors side by side and indeed they are pretty close to each other, which impressed me. You'll also see the main sensor array mounted on a pole. This is a WS90 which has ultrasonic wind and haptic rain - it also has a small, in-built solar panel to keep a 'supercap'* suitably charged, which even in the depths of a central England winter is doing a sterling job of keeping it running (which is just as well - we fitted that pole and the station in very cold temperatures and I really don't want to go back up there to change the batteries :) )

The rain from the haptic sensor is 'interesting' - it does detect very fine drizzle (that the Davis, with its 'traditional' tipping bucket, does not detect) but it tends to over-read by large amounts. The 'gain' of the piezo rain sensor (as it's called) can be adjusted, and this has been going on for a few weeks now, but it's still way off compared to the Davis bucket. You do have the option of adding a more 'normal' tipping bucket to the system (a WH40), but I haven't (yet) and it'll be interesting to see if I can get it and the Davis roughly agreeing on rain amounts :)

They also do a variety of other interesting sensors - particulate matter for example (I procured a WH46D for testing with WeatherCat 4) along with a lighting sensor (which I do not have) and laser depth sensors (snow), again I don't have this either**, all at reasonable prices. I can't make a comment as to the reliability of these somewhat more interesting sensors, but the fact that they are available for the system is impressive!

--

*A large capacitor which can act as a power supply for the unit - indeed it's the main power supply (two AA batteries are fitted for backup).
**Anyone with these, please go test with WeatherCat 4 :)
88
Development Blog / Highly entertaining fix of the week
« Last post by WCDev on January 25, 2026, 03:49:30 PM »
Really??? (Possibly only funny to anyone who's written code to interpret FO's archive .csv files, but it gave me a huge chuckle that they'd actually do this, which they did).

Also, possibly the fastest fix in the history of software engineering :)
89
Web-site/Forum news / The forums are now fully open
« Last post by Administrator on January 25, 2026, 02:49:40 PM »
Hello all,
I'm very happy to announce that all forums are now fully operational again. If you spot any issues, please post in this thread.

Note: If you are an existing member, you will need to agree to updated user and privacy agreements on your first login.

Apologies for any inconvenience and a massive thanks to Ken and wxforum.net for the support whilst we were down!

90
Web-site/Forum news / How To Submit A Complaint
« Last post by Administrator on January 25, 2026, 12:38:23 AM »
Complaint Process

How to submit a complaint on this forum:
Use the “Report” Button: This is the primary and most efficient method for reporting content or users. The “Report” button is located on each post, private message, or user profile.

When reporting, you must:
Provide a detailed reason for your report. Specify the nature of the issue, clearly indicating whether you believe the content or behaviour is illegal under the UK's Online Safety Act (OSA), harmful (and if so, to whom), or a violation of our community guidelines as outlined in our Terms and Policies.
Reference specific OSA provisions, Ofcom guidance (including the Codes of Practice), or sections of our community guidelines where possible. This will assist us in assessing the complaint. Use Ofcom’s published resources to help identify the relevant provisions.
Indicate the urgency of the matter if you believe it involves an imminent threat to life or serious illegal activity.

Email: You may send an email to webmaster@trixology.com. Use this method only when the “Report” button is not applicable or when you need to provide extensive documentation.

We will prioritise complaints that involve potential violations of the UK's on-line safety act (OSA), especially those related to priority offences or serious harm, and align with the measures outlined in Ofcom’s Codes of Practice.

Information to Include in Your Complaint:
When submitting a complaint, please provide as much of the following information as possible:
Link: A direct link to the specific content (post, message, profile) you are reporting.
Username: The username of the user who posted the content or exhibited the behaviour.
Description: A clear and detailed description of the content or behaviour you are reporting. Explain why you believe it is illegal under the OSA, harmful (and to whom), or a violation of our community guidelines. Be specific about the type of illegal or harmful content you are reporting (e.g., CSAM, terrorist content, content promoting self-harm, hate speech). Reference specific sections of the OSA, Ofcom’s guidance (including their codes of practice), or our community guidelines where applicable.
Evidence: Provide screenshots or other supporting evidence, if possible and relevant.
Your Details (Optional): Your username and email address (if you wish to receive updates). Providing contact information helps us to follow up if we need more information. However, we understand if you wish to remain anonymous. Note that anonymous reports may be more difficult to fully investigate.
Urgency: If you believe the matter involves an imminent threat to life or serious illegal activity, clearly state this in your report and mark it as “URGENT.”

Complaint Handling:
Acknowledgment: Due to extremely limited resources, we cannot guarantee acknowledgment of all complaints. We will prioritise acknowledging complaints that appear to involve serious illegal content, particularly “priority offences” under the OSA, or content that poses an immediate threat to a user’s safety.
Initial Assessment: A moderator will review the complaint to determine:
Whether the reported content or behaviour falls within the scope of this procedure and whether the complaint aligns with the recommended measures in Ofcom’s Codes of Practice, especially regarding reporting and complaint procedures. (ICU D1 to ICU D14).
The urgency and severity of the issue, prioritising illegal content, content harmful to children, and content posing an immediate threat. We will use Ofcom’s guidance to help us assess the severity of the reported content.
Whether the complaint provides sufficient information for our limited investigation.
Whether the complaint relates to a potential breach of our Terms of Service by another user or by us.

Investigation: Our investigation will be strictly limited to reviewing the reported content, the user’s recent activity on the forum, and any evidence provided. We do not have dedicated investigative resources, legal expertise, or advanced technical tools. We will primarily rely on the information provided in the complaint and our own limited observations. We may not be able to conduct in-depth investigations in all cases.

Decision and Action: Based on the investigation, our moderators will decide on the appropriate action within their capacity. Possible actions include:
No Action:
  • If the content/behaviour does not violate UK law, our community guidelines, or pose a significant risk of harm based on our assessment.
    If we lack the capacity or expertise to make a definitive determination within a reasonable timeframe.
    If the complaint is deemed to be vexatious or without merit.

Warning: Issuing a formal warning to the user responsible for the content or behaviour.

Content Removal: Removing or editing the reported content if it violates our guidelines or is deemed illegal under the OSA.

Account Suspension: Temporarily or permanently suspending the user’s account, particularly in cases of repeated or serious violations.
Reporting to Authorities: Reporting content or activity to the appropriate authorities (e.g., police, NCA, CEOP, IWF) if we believe it to be illegal under the OSA, particularly in cases of CSAM, terrorist content, or content posing an imminent threat to life or safety. We will prioritise reporting the most serious illegal content as required by law and our ethical obligations, and we will follow Ofcom’s guidance on reporting to authorities.

Communication:
We will only be able to inform you of the outcome of your complaint if:
You provided contact information.
The outcome directly affects you (e.g., you were the target of harassment).
We have the resources to do so.
We will not disclose specific actions taken against other users due to privacy concerns, resource constraints, and potential legal implications.

Appeals: If you disagree with the outcome of your complaint regarding content moderation, you can appeal by contacting the forum Admin. Appeals will only be considered in exceptional circumstances, and only if the appeal is made about content that we have taken a decision on (i.e., it is not an appeal made in relation to a complaint about our alleged failure to uphold our terms of service), and when resources permit. Appeals are not available for complaints regarding our alleged failure to uphold our terms of service.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10