. . . shortened . . .
Now would a Meteobridge Pro Red be the best solution here? Replaces the console/Weatherlink IP and is remotely re-bootable - I can power it down remotely via the UPS.
If you do not have WiFi at the remote location, you should use the Meteobridge Pro Red which is more expensive and receives the data directly from the ISS
If your console is still working correctly and you have WiFi, you can also use a Meteobridge_nano which physically replaces your IP-logger.
Same size but it needs WiFi, not a cable, to connect to your network.
All other Meteobridge devices need a console/Envoy and a logger.
Am I right in thinking I can get WeatherCat to pull the same data from the Meteobridge and still build all the custom graphs for my website - as it does with the current set up?
. . . shortened . . .
Yes, a Meteobridge (of any type) can be used by 1 (one) other weather-program.
The Meteobridge-IP with port 22222 can be used in Weathercat as if it is a Davis-IP logger.
Important in your case ( 500 mile roundtrip)You can remotely and securely log-in to your Meteobridge (of any type) and, if needed, also reboot or reload new firmware versions a.s.o.
So if there is a problem, f.i. caused by the console (when using a Nano), you can check the Meteobridge log remotely. Or the developer of Meteobridge can investigate your setup to find the cause of any problems
https://www.meteobridge.com/wiki/index.php/SystemMeteobridge offers a feature that allows you to login from the Internet without the need to configure your router accordingly. This feature is turned off per default to maximize your Internet security. When you switch this service on it will take 5 minutes until your Meteobridge is available per an individual URL from the Internet. It is highly recommended to set your Meteobridge password to a non-default value and not to share this URL with the public, to avoid that other persons log in to your Meteobridge web interface. Technical solution behind this is, that on your request the Meteobridge builds up a ssh tunnel to a dedicated gateway server in the Internet, where this tunnel can be used to login to your Meteobridge. Communication to this gateway server is done via HTTPS to make sure data is not compromised. Gateway server is managed by the developers of the Meteobridge software, smartbedded UG. If you are behind a company grade firewall limiting outgoing traffic or forced to use a http proxy, this solution might not work, but in majority of cases it should work.
There is 1 alternative, the WiFilogger but that does not has that remote login "out of the box"
You can also continue to upload to WeatherLink.com using the Meteobridge/WiFilogger, you use the DID (Mac) of the IP logger in the device-setup
Succes,
Wim