We had a major storm front pass through yesterday evening with three very intense rainfall peaks occurring at roughly one-hour intervals between 7 and 9:30 p.m. WeatherCat calculated rain/hour intensity levels exceeding 10 inches/hour for periods ranging from two to seven minutes at various times. Apparently the Davis tipping-bucket rain gauge design is unable to keep up rainfalls of that intensity because the total amount recorded was 0.22 inch lower than what was observed in the manual CoCoRaHS gauge.
I've started inspecting it weekly
Good advice for all of us! 100" an hour - that is quite a threshold. Noah's flood perhaps? [thunder]
pulled the collector off and took a look, no leaves nor critters were in the tipping mechanism.Do you have the upside down plastic cone/screen thingy? I'm not sure they've always had that. I see they have a different one that's more like a slotted disk, I think he cone-shaped one has smaller slots and traps stuff better, but I've not run any scientific tests...
Looks like I may have to dig out the book Edouard referenced to see if it gives any accuracy guarantees at the higher rainfall rates.
Rain rate: to 96''/hr.; 2438 mm/hr
Do you have the upside down plastic cone/screen thingy? I'm not sure they've always had that. I see they have a different one that's more like a slotted disk, I think he cone-shaped one has smaller slots and traps stuff better, but I've not run any scientific tests...
Found this link, Edouard and they make no accuracy guarantee above a rainfall rate of four inches/hour.
Highly recommend the new and improved model. You might ask for "upgrade pricing" and a loyalty discount! I'm bettin' you can arrange a "deal" for less than $50! :o
What sort of rainfall rates was your station reporting at the time? Were you significantly above 4"/hr?
Believe my first post said in excess of 10 inches/hour, three separate times. And those weren't just momentary peaks at that intensity!
Hence, why I said the gauge was "overwhelmed." Quite frankly, I just flat don't believe a tipping bucket design emptying at three times/sec (for a 100 inch/hour rate) could maintain a reasonable accuracy level...which is likely the reason Davis is silent about accuracy beyond the four inch/hour rate.
Actually, the cone/top is well below the top/rim of the gauge. Whatever you were using for a cap should still work.
I assume that you do not use/have the anti-bird "spikes" either. The newer collector has ting holes in the top of the little bump thingies around the rim of the collector.
Frankly, I've looked askance at the "Rain Alerts" that ended up having only hundredth of an inch total accumulation.
keeps the dust out during the long dry seasonI suppose you get a week or so warning before any rain?! :o [banghead] [lol]
Quotekeeps the dust out during the long dry seasonI suppose you get a week or so warning before any rain?! :o [banghead] [lol]
Frankly, I've looked askance at the "Rain Alerts" that ended up having only hundredth of an inch total accumulation.
Depends on where you live. Here in the west we live for a hundredth of an inch. That's definitely a rain day.
Just a noobie question: Wouldn't the wire cloth break up the regular rain into smaller 'drops'? If so, would that affect the 'rain drop' counter?! [goofy]
Herb, once again you have maintained your place on my Hero List.