Dear HantaYo, xairbusdriver, Felix and WeatherCat drought watchers,
Out of curiosity, Edouard, are there stats showing the percentages of water used by the city/urban population versus other major users like the tech industry, agriculture, etc? I guess what I'm wondering is whether the mandatory water usage restriction on the population centers (lawns, car washes, swimming pools and the like) is actually targeting the correct segment to make the most impact on slowing the water reserve rate-of-depletion.
The mechanism of rationing is very carefully organized to minimize the number of unhappy -
voters. That's by far the main criteria.
Fox news did a careful analysis of the role of Jerry Brown who was governor during the 1976-77 drought and was reelected to be our current governor. Even in the face of that earlier drought, Brown fought against increasing water storage capacity - siding with environmentalists, even if the population was growing rapidly and still is.
I've heard nothing about any planned residential and/or commercial building permit restrictions and that would seem to be a way to help slow state population growth over the long term if population increase is a major driver in California water usage.
What!?!? restrict the inflow of - more
voters? Of course there should have been a building moratorium until the water supply was vastly -
expanded. This drought is already approaching the severity of the 1976-77 drought and the population was significantly smaller. Tree ring data shows that, without any climate change, droughts lasting decades or more are a normal occurrence in California. Right now there is one year of water reserve remaining. What is going to happen if the drought lasts another 8 years or longer?
Supposedly we are a modern society guided by rational decision making informed by science. Yet, this is just one of many circumstances were modern societies are playing Russian-roulette. A decade long drought in California could bring the United States (and therefore the world) to its knees. How many more times with a apathetic and disinterested public elect playboy politicians instead of tough-minded leaders? I'm certainly not looking forward to finding out which is the next chamber to have a bullet in it.
Oh well,. . . . . . . . Edouard