Dear WeatherCat faithful,
As mentioned elsewhere, I upgraded to High Sierra (macOS 10.13.6) this past Monday. I have been pleased to see that High Sierra seems to manage memory a bit better than it predecessor. Amazingly, WeatherCat itself is using quite a bit less memory than before. Here is a graph with the before and after:
As you can see, over the previous weekend WeatherCat memory growth was quite rapid. Monday afternoon into Tuesday I restarted WeatherCat a few times until I finally resolved the problem with my
WC AppleScript Tags Processor script. WeatherCat has been running now for almost 3 days and it is no where close to the 750 MB of RAM it was using over the weekend.
So those of you lagging behind as I was, perhaps it is indeed worth the trouble of upgrading to High Sierra after all.
Cheers, Edouard